Comments on: 60fps vs 24fps http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/ Freelance Design Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:49:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Eugenia http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-12135 Eugenia Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:43:39 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-12135 Some real life footage shot at 60fps, for comparison next to the same video at 30fps.<br><a href="http://eugenia.blogsome.com/2007/05/25/60-fps-video-part-ii/" rel="nofollow">http://eugenia.blogsome.com/2007/05/25/60-fps-v...</a> Some real life footage shot at 60fps, for comparison next to the same video at 30fps.
http://eugenia.blogsome.com/2007/05/25/60-fps-v...

]]> By: Kim http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-9156 Kim Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:23:50 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-9156 Ah, yes, thanks for the notice. I'll have that fixed in a few minutes. Ah, yes, thanks for the notice. I’ll have that fixed in a few minutes.

]]> By: Jamesp http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-9153 Jamesp Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:03:53 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-9153 The AVI download link seems to be Broke. I've tried manually downloading though (right click, save as) but it only saves a 39.0 byte avi file. The AVI download link seems to be Broke. I’ve tried manually downloading though (right click, save as) but it only saves a 39.0 byte avi file.

]]> By: mark http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-7336 mark Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:10:15 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-7336 Can i please some mirror? Can i please some mirror?

]]> By: FoxSpirit http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-110 FoxSpirit Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:18:55 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-110 A suggestion for the video: I can’t really make out the difference when the stuff runs side to side but clearly when you show it quickly in sucession. Other people might have had that too, so maybe a few more sections with wide sweeps and and 15 second pieces of gameplay alternating? And nothing too hectic, I feel you can perceive this better when the action is only average. A suggestion for the video: I can’t really make out the difference when the stuff runs side to side but clearly when you show it quickly in sucession. Other people might have had that too, so maybe a few more sections with wide sweeps and and 15 second pieces of gameplay alternating?
And nothing too hectic, I feel you can perceive this better when the action is only average.

]]> By: McKack http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-109 McKack Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:18:25 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-109 Remember to have V-Sync ON ;) Remember to have V-Sync ON ;)

]]> By: bobby http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-108 bobby Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:18:06 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-108 i normally play cs with a crt @ 100hz with 100fps. On a tft 60 fps @ 60hz is ok too, but in generall everthing under 60fps is laggy for me. i normally play cs with a crt @ 100hz with 100fps. On a tft 60 fps @ 60hz is ok too, but in generall everthing under 60fps is laggy for me.

]]> By: Ben http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-107 Ben Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:17:42 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-107 The comparison with the ball showed a much bigger difference than the game. I think with the game there’s so much going on anyway, you’re constantly focusing on different areas of the screen, so it’s not as obvious. But yes, there is a difference. Although, I’m sure that there are many people who will enjoy the “nostalgia” of the “slow” frame-rate. Of course, there’s the refresh rate of the computer monitor to take into account, too. If the monitor is only set at 50Hz, and you’re seeing a 100fps video, then you’re missing out on half the frames due to the monitor’s refresh rate. I guess the key is to have the monitor be the limiting factor, rather than the frame-rate. Gamers always want faster and better graphics anyway, so the more the better. ;-) The comparison with the ball showed a much bigger difference than the game. I think with the game there’s so much going on anyway, you’re constantly focusing on different areas of the screen, so it’s not as obvious. But yes, there is a difference.
Although, I’m sure that there are many people who will enjoy the “nostalgia” of the “slow” frame-rate.
Of course, there’s the refresh rate of the computer monitor to take into account, too. If the monitor is only set at 50Hz, and you’re seeing a 100fps video, then you’re missing out on half the frames due to the monitor’s refresh rate. I guess the key is to have the monitor be the limiting factor, rather than the frame-rate.
Gamers always want faster and better graphics anyway, so the more the better. ;-)

]]> By: McKack http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-106 McKack Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:17:19 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-106 Hmmm, yeah. What one should try though is an animation of pictures, like photos. That would eliminate any motion blur, done correctly ofcourse, lightning quick exposure etc. But like I commented on your site, 24fps for films have that special feeling to it, I know I wouldn’t have it smoother just cause it’s smoother at first anyways. Time shall tell if 60fps will be the new thing though I guess. But then again they might as well just bump it up to 100 ;) Hmmm, yeah. What one should try though is an animation of pictures, like photos. That would eliminate any motion blur, done correctly ofcourse, lightning quick exposure etc. But like I commented on your site, 24fps for films have that special feeling to it, I know I wouldn’t have it smoother just cause it’s smoother at first anyways. Time shall tell if 60fps will be the new thing though I guess. But then again they might as well just bump it up to 100 ;)

]]> By: Eugenia http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-105 Eugenia Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:11:19 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-105 Some real life footage shot at 60fps, for comparison next to the same video at 30fps. http://eugenia.blogsome.com/2007/05/25/60-fps-video-part-ii/ Some real life footage shot at 60fps, for comparison next to the same video at 30fps.
http://eugenia.blogsome.com/2007/05/25/60-fps-video-part-ii/

]]> By: McKack http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-104 McKack Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:10:41 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-104 Indeed. However some people that aren’t used to high framerates apparently have a hard time telling the difference :) But if you’re used to high framerates like 50+ then anything lower is pretty noticable yes. You might call it a curse in disguise. Indeed. However some people that aren’t used to high framerates apparently have a hard time telling the difference :) But if you’re used to high framerates like 50+ then anything lower is pretty noticable yes. You might call it a curse in disguise.

]]> By: Anonymous http://kimpix.net/2006/12/03/60fps-vs-24fps/comment-page-1/#comment-103 Anonymous Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:09:22 +0000 http://kimpix.net/?p=24#comment-103 My eyes only think things are smooth 50fps + ….beneath that is laggy… The only place i accept 30 fps is in movies…. My eyes only think things are smooth 50fps + ….beneath that is laggy…

The only place i accept 30 fps is in movies….

]]>